Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court refused relief to a retail industry group seeking to quash regulations that significantly increased annual licensing fees for the sale of tobacco and nicotine inhaling products. The court found the group lacked standing to challenge the statutory instrument since it was not directly affected, and distinguished between direct harm and hypothetical or collective interests. Even if standing had existed, the regulations were held lawful as the minister was entitled to set fees with broader public health objectives in mind, rather than solely to recover administrative costs. The court rejected arguments that the fees were arbitrary, irrational, or amounted to an unauthorised tax, and concluded that the purpose of discouraging tobacco sales was consistent with the statutory framework and policy aims.
judicial review – licence fees – statutory instrument – Public Health (Tobacco Products and Nicotine Inhaling Products) Act 2023 – representative standing – administrative law – licensing regime – ultra vires – irrationality – public health policy – tobacco regulation – disincentivisation – economic impact on retailers – authority of Minister for Health – Rules of the Superior Courts – standing (locus standi)
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only e-mail alert service for all Irish judgments over the past 13 years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now