Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses an application for judicial review seeking to quash a Circuit Family Court order appointing a social worker to conduct a review assessment under statute, on the grounds that there was no evidence that the Circuit Family Court failed to consider the applicant's arguments or that the appointment of the social worker was outside the court's jurisdiction.
Judicial Review - Guardianship of Infants Act, 1964 - Parental Alienation - Certiorari - Review Assessment - Social Worker - Section 32 - Circuit Family Court - High Court - Expert Witness - Best Interests of the Child - Adversarial Hearing - Evidence - Rationality - Statutory Time Limits - Order 84 - G v. Director of Public Prosecutions - CG v. BG - Section 47 Report - McD v. L - Guardianship of Infants Act 1964 (Child’s Views Expert) Regulations 2018.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.