Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Supreme Court dismisses appeal from High Court, and affirms determination that a legislative provision requiring certain persons to give an account of their movements was not repugnant to the Constitution, on the grounds that: (a) the right to silence was a corollary of the right to free expression; (b) there were already in existence many statutes requiring disclosure of information on pain of penal sanction; (c) the legislative provision in question only came into effect at times when there was a risk to the administration of justice and the preservation of public peace and order; (d) the right to silence had to yield to the right of the State to protect itself; and (e) the restriction on the right was proportional to the aims of the legislation.
O'Flaherty J (nem diss): Appeal from dismissal of claim challenging constitutional validity of legislation - s. 52 of theOffences Against the State Act 1939 - refusal by appellants to provide account of their movements - freedom of expression - Art 40 - whether right of freedom of expression could be abrogated or qualified - Misprision of Felony (concealment of a felony) - limits on right of silence - self-incrimination - requirements of disclosure in other statutes - duties to disclose - circumstances in which relevant section came into operation - proportionality of restriction on right to silence.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only subject matter index for all Irish judgments over the past thirteen years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now