Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal upholds the High Court's decision to refuse interlocutory orders sought by the plaintiff to prevent the sale of three properties by the defendants via an internet auction, where the plaintiff contended that the insolvency practitioner, acting as both receiver and agent, created a conflict of interest, but the court found no fair question to be tried, as the dual appointment did not inherently lead to a conflict of interest, and the plaintiff failed to demonstrate how damages would not be an adequate remedy.
interlocutory orders - injunction - internet auction - Donegal properties - bona fide issue - conflict of interest - insolvency practitioner - receiver - agent - mortgagee - mortgagor - sale of property - High Court - Court of Appeal - Everyday Finance DAC - AIB - Conveyancing Act 1881 - balance of convenience - undertaking as to damages - receivership - agency agreement - realisation of security - lis pendens.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only e-mail alert service for all Irish judgments over the past 13 years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now