Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses to quash refusal of jobseekers' allowance to self-employed nationals of Bulgaria and Romania who were out of work, on grounds that: (a) the provision that those without a right to reside in the State should not have access to social welfare entitlements was indirectly discriminatory but objectively justified and proportionate to the legitimate aim of best using the limited resources of the State; (b) the question as to whether the applicants were still self-employed did not arise as neither applicant was employed any longer and they were never employed by anyone in the State; and (c) any support from the Social Welfare system would mean that the applicants would become a financial burden upon the State.
Judicial review – applicants seeking order quashing decision of Minister to refuse their application for jobseeker’s allowance – applicants from Bulgaria and Romania, self-employed in Ireland for 3+ years but currently out of work - both applicants available for and actively seeking work – habitual residence in Ireland is a condition for qualifying for jobseeker’s allowance – whether applicants could have habitual residence in Ireland if no longer had right to reside in Ireland – whether applicants had right to reside in Ireland if no longer had work – whether applicants retained self-employed status – European law – freedom of movement - whether the consideration of their application was erroneously premised on the provisions of Directive 2004/38 - applicants seeking declaration that they should be assessed for social welfare support on basis that they retain status of self-employed persons – Regulation 883/2004 – Art. 6(2)(c)(ii) European Communities (Free Movement of Persons) (No.2) Regulations – Art.7(3)(b) Directive 2004/38/EC – whether applicants retain right to reside in Ireland pursuant to the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU – guarantee of equal treatment in Art.3 Regulation 883/2003 – whether jobseeker’s allowance is social security or social assistance – whether respondent should have considered their applications under Regulation 388/2004 – whether persons who had been self-employed in the State retained a right to reside – court accepts that the provision that those without a right to reside in the State should not have access to social welfare entitlements is indirectly discriminatory but objectively justified – proportionate to the legitimate aim of best using the limited resources of the State – question as to whether the applicants are still self-employed does not arise – neither applicant employed any longer – never employed by anyone in the State – court fails to see significance of whether jobseeker’s allowance is social security or social assistance – applicants would be a financial burden upon the State – applicants not entitled to the reliefs sought.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.