Sentence for manslaughter following fatal car accident did not fall outside available range

Criminal law – sentencing – appeal against severity of sentence - three concurrent sentences, each of ten years with the final year suspended, were imposed in respect of three counts of manslaughter contrary to common law - fatal road traffic accident - three people lost their lives in the collision – events before the accident – drinking – assault - a state of heightened arousal – driving at excessive speed – snapchat videos - victim impact report - personal circumstances of the Appellant - discussion and decision – something in the nature of an error in principle must be identified - sentence being appealed or reviewed must be one that falls outside the available range - substantial custodial sentence was inevitable - judge is not to be criticised for identifying a headline sentence of fourteen years - headline or pre- mitigation sentence of fourteen years not impermissible in the circumstances - sentence ultimately imposed did not fall outside the available range – appeal dismiss