Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal refuses DPP's application to have a sentence for money laundering reviewed, on the grounds that: (a) while the sentence was very lenient, it was not so lenient as to be significantly outside the norm; and (b) the sentencing judge acted within his legitimate discretion in seeking to prioritise the reformation of the respondent, and partial suspension of the post-mitigation sentence was not excessive, albeit it was very generous.
Offence: money laundering
Original sentence: three years with 18 months suspended
Appeal by: prosecution (statutory application)
Outcome: application refused
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.