Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal acceded to DPP's application and varies sentence for attempted robbery, on the grounds that: (a) the sentence imposed by the sentencing judge was significantly outside the norm for such an offence given the many aggravating factors present; and (b) while rehabilitation was an important objective in sentencing, there had been no material before the sentencing judge justifying a further reduction in sentence or the suspension of a portion of the sentence.
Offence: attempted robbery
Original sentence: 12 months with 5 months suspended
Appeal by: prosecution (statutory application)
Outcome: sentence quashed and new sentence substituted of two and a half years
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.