Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal dismisses appeal of sentences totaling eleven years with the final two suspended imposed for attempted rape, sexual assault and the restriction of the personal liberty of a child for the purposes of sexual exploitation, on the grounds that the sentence cannot be said to fall outside the ranges of sentences that were available to the trial judge.
Criminal law – sentencing – attempted rape, sexual assault and the restriction of the personal liberty of a child for the purposes of sexual exploitation – appeal against severity of eleven years’ imprisonment on the attempted rape count and to four years’ imprisonment on the other counts with the final two years of the sentence suspended – whether the sentence was properly positioned on the scale of seriousness – whether the defence was conducted with a degree of considerable restraint and that the cross examination was as sensitive as is possible to such an extent as to result in a lower sentence – sentence imposed cannot be said to fall outside the ranges of sentences that were available to the trial judge – appeal dismissed.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.