Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal dismisses appeal against the severity of sentence of four years' imprisonment with the final year suspended imposed for sexual assault, on the grounds that the four-year headline sentence identified was appropriate, the sentence was not excessive, and no error in principle was identified.
Criminal law – sentencing – appeal against the severity of sentence of four years' imprisonment with the final year suspended imposed for sexual assault – whether the four year headline sentence identified was appropriate – sentence was not excessive – no error in principle identified – appeal dismissed.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.