Court of Appeal allows appeal of sentences imposed on two appellants for reckless discharge of a firearm, possession of ammunition in suspicious circumstances and damaging property, and increases the effective sentences to five years' imprisonment and four years (with the unserved balance suspended), on the grounds that in light of the deliberate discharging of the shotgun in the proximity of gardaí, the sentences imposed were significantly unduly lenient and required adjustment.
Criminal law – sentencing – undue leniency – whether sentences of three and a half years and two and a half years imposed for reckless discharge of a firearm, possession of ammunition in suspicious circumstances and damaging property were unduly lenient – vehicle failed to stop and attempted to ram the garda vehicles – Mr. Loughlin produced a firearm and discharged it from the passenger window of the BMW car – s. 8 of the Firearms and Offensive Weapons Act 1990 – s. 27A(1) of the Firearms Act 1964 – s. 2 of the Criminal Damage Act 1991 – whether the sentences imposed amount to an error on principle for offences categorised as being in the mid range – whether the sentencing judge erred in principle in finding that there were exceptional circumstances on account of the fact that the accused had pleaded and had cooperated – whether the sentencing judge erred in principle in his assessment of all the relevant factors in imposing the sentences in respect of the firearms offences – s. 59 of the Criminal Justice Act 2006 – appropriate headline sentences are, in respect of the possession the firearms offences for both respondents a term of seven years imprisonment and in respect of the discharging offence also seven years imprisonment – sentences imposed were significantly unduly lenient and require adjustment – sentences of five years' imprisonment and four years (with the unserved balance suspended) substituted – appeal allowed.