Court of Appeal upholds the sentences of two individuals convicted of rape, on the grounds that the original sentences were appropriate given the gravity of the offenses, which included the planned and cynical exploitation of a vulnerable victim; and the court emphasised the importance of retribution and deterrence over rehabilitation in this case, given the egregious nature of the crimes.
Court of Appeal - rape - sexual assault - Central Criminal Court - sentencing appeal - mitigating factors - victim impact statement - probation report - reoffending risk - rehabilitation - retribution - deterrence - headline sentence - appeal dismissed - vulnerability of victim - exploitation - intoxication - planned offense - remorse - family circumstances.