Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses an application by a defendant seeking to appeal a Circuit Court order that had recorded a settlement agreement between the parties, on the grounds that the settlement agreement, which had been read and agreed to in court, could not be appealed or renegotiated through the purported appeal, as final orders, including those made on consent, are conclusive.
Property dispute - settlement agreement - litigant in person - conveyancing - default scenario - High Court - Circuit Court - appeal - enforcement - final orders - consent order - undue influence - duress - liberty to apply - Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009 - mortgage arrears - compromise - Charalambous v Nagle [2011] IESC 11 - Belville Holdings Ltd v The Revenue Commissioners [1994] 1 I.L.R.M 29.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only fast reporting service for all Irish judgments over the past ten years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now