Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Simultaneous trials ordered in four defamation cases stemming from related newspaper reports
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court has directed that four defamation cases, all based on newspaper articles reporting the same District Court proceedings, be heard simultaneously by one judge and jury. The plaintiff, who had sought separate trials for each case, withdrew claims for personal injury damages, allowing the cases to proceed before a jury. The court found that the overlap in facts, legal principles, witnesses, and damages claims favored a single trial, which would save court time and costs and reduce the risk of confusion or inconsistent damages awards. The decision follows the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal's treatment of the cases as substantially similar, with the Court of Appeal noting the similarity of the articles despite different headlines.
defamation, simultaneous trials, jury trial, withdrawal of personal injury claims, Courts Act 1998, privilege defense, saving of court time, risk of irreconcilable decisions, overlap of damages, Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, High Court, newspaper readership, legal principles, factual overlap, Tracey v Irish Times Limited and Others [2019] IESC 62, Tracey v Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Limited [2023] IECA 1.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
