High Court dismisses a squatter's application to set aside orders granting administration of two estates, finding the squatter had no standing to challenge the orders, on the grounds that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate any legal interest in the estates or provide evidence to support her claim of fraud in obtaining the orders, and only those with a legitimate interest in an estate can challenge administration orders.
Estate administration - squatter - standing - High Court - Succession Act 1965 - administration orders - fraud allegation - locus standi - special circumstances - letters of administration - Order 79 Rule 5(9) RSC - administration bond - bona fide claim - inherent jurisdiction - abuse of process - dismissal of proceedings.