Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court has directed the State defendants to make further and better discovery in a case alleging illegal adoptions facilitated by falsifying birth records. The plaintiff, placed for adoption as an infant, claims his constitutional rights were violated by the State's failure to prevent such practices. The court found reasonable grounds to believe that additional relevant documents exist but have not been disclosed, particularly concerning the prosecution of an individual linked to illegal adoptions at a nursing home. The State defendants had previously agreed to make further discovery for four categories, and the court has now ordered further discovery for the remaining category, with a focus on the State's knowledge of illegal adoption practices.
illegal adoption, falsified birth records, constitutional rights, further and better discovery, State defendants, Holy Orders of the Religious Sisters of Charity, prosecution, Department of Health, Department of Foreign Affairs, Gardaí (police), Mother and Baby Homes Commission of Investigation, Tusla (Child and Family Agency), Adoption Authority of Ireland, Health Service Executive, Dublin Health Authority, necessity and relevance of discovery, affidavit of discovery, privilege claims, Sterling-Winthrop Group Ltd v Farbenfabriken Bayer AG.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only fast reporting service for all Irish judgments over the past ten years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now