Court of Appeal, in a judgment supplemental to a previous judgment in which it was held that the appellant's appeal against an order of the High Court requiring it to provide security for the respondent's costs of the action should be dismissed, makes an order directing the appellant to pay the costs of the respondent, and refuses an application for a stay on execution, on the grounds that no arguable ground of appeal had been identified by the appellant.
Court of Appeal - costs - judgment supplemental to previous judgment in which it was held that the appellant's appeal against an order of the High Court requiring it to provide security for the respondent's costs of the action should be dismissed - court had expressed the provisional view that the respondent, having been entirely successful on the appeal, was entitled to an order for its costs of the appeal - appellant did not oppose the making of an order for the respondent's costs of the appeal but asked that a stay be put on execution of the order for a period of twenty one days and in the event of an application to the Supreme Court for leave to appeal, then until the determination of any such application - respondent opposed stay application - legal principles - appellant had not identified an arguable ground of appeal - appellant directed to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal - application for a stay refused - appellant directed to pay the respondent's costs of its written submission on the stay application.