Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court, in an application for summary judgment arising from an agreement to sell shareholdings in companies, where the defendants had failed to put in a replying affidavit: (a) refuses to grant an adjournment to allow settlement discussions to continue; (b) determines that the purchasers and guarantors were liable for the balance of €4.384 million; (c) determines that one of the guarantors was liable for a sum of €41,454 in respect of legal fees; (d) remits to plenary hearing the liability of another defendant in respect of legal fees; and (e) adjourns for further determination the form of the order to be granted, where a dispute arose between the plaintiffs.
Application for summary judgment - €4.4 million - agreement to sell shareholding in companies - guarantees - amendment to agreement - one payment made under agreement, but balance unpaid - agreement to discharge legal fees - application for adjournment - whether it was very clear that the Defendants had no case - whether guarantor might have been discharged from its obligations - whether guarantor had been consulted on and agreed to variation in agreement - whether prejudice to guarantor.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.