Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court, in a supplemental judgment: (a) determines the terms of an order concerning a superannuation scheme, where there had been resignations from the superannuation committee, leading it to be below quorum to agree the terms of the order; and (b) makes no order as to the costs of the litigation.
Superannuation scheme, solvency contributions, statutory funding standard, member benefits, Legal Services Regulation Act 2015 (LSRA), inherent supervisory jurisdiction, trust scheme, costs and expenses, adversarial proceedings, special summons, rule interpretation, fund solvency, committee quorum, legal dispute resolution, court orders.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.