Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses to surrender respondent to Romania on foot of a European Arrest Warrant, on the grounds that there was no correspondence between the offence in the warrant and an offence in Irish law.
European arrest warrant – custodial warrant – Romanian authorities seeking the surrender of respondent - respondent was not present in person at the trial after which the sentence was passed – further information – how long the respondent would have to request a retrial – family circumstances - Safety Plan which prevents her partner from being unsupervised with the children – lack of correspondence – whether the use of somebody else’s identity document for the purposes of being issued a temporary passport constitutes an offence in this jurisdiction – no correspondence with use of false instrument – no “gain” or “loss” – no correspondence with an offence in Irish law – surrender refused –
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.