The High Court ordered the surrender of the respondent to the issuing state to serve a three-year prison sentence, following a request on foot of a European Arrest Warrant relating to convictions for multiple thefts and participation in a criminal association. The court rejected all objections raised by the respondent, which included arguments over lack of clarity in the warrant, alleged disproportionate interference with family rights, concerns regarding the potential for inhuman or degrading treatment in prison, and issues concerning the provision of a retrial in the issuing state. The court found that the relevant legal requirements were met, determining that sufficient detail and correspondence existed as to the offences, mutual trust obligations had not been rebutted, and the respondent’s personal circumstances did not reach the threshold to prevent surrender.
European Arrest Warrant – surrender for sentence service – theft – criminal association – absentia conviction – three-year prison sentence – mutual trust – prison conditions – Article 3 ECHR – Article 8 ECHR – family rights – section 45 – section 37 – section 11(1)(d) – correspondence of offences – French prison – application for retrial – High Court