Court of Appeal allows appeal of unduly lenient sentence imposed in respect of historical sexual abuse and rape of a young child between 1973 and 1982, finding that the sentencing judge erred in principle in suspending nine years of the total sentence after allowing for excessive mitigation for the respondent’s medical condition.
Criminal law – sentencing – application by DPP to review sentence – undue leniency – s. 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1993 – eight counts of rape and eight counts of indecent assault in the Central Criminal Court – sentences of 12 years' imprisonment in respect of each count of rape, with nine years suspended, and three years imprisonment in respect of each count of indecent assault – s. 31 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 2010 – Illness or infirmity as a mitigating feature in sentencing – no rule that prevents those who are ill from being sent to prison – whether the trial judge erred in principle in allowing by way of excessive mitigation for the respondent’s medical condition – sentencing judge was an error in principle and the sentence, insofar as it directed the suspension of nine years, was unduly lenient.