Take back request was made before applicable Regulation came into force

Judicial review – asylum and immigration – substantive decision – national from Guinea seeking to require the Minister for Justice to hear his appeal against refusal of subsidiary protection – refused asylum – applied for subsidiary protection – applied for asylum in UK – transferred back to this state – again applied for asylum in UK – Minister refused him subsidiary protection - again transferred back to Ireland – refused leave to land – withdrew application for leave to make new asylum application – application to revoke deportation order revoked - sought information from the Minister regarding the applicant’s alleged entitlement to appeal the subsidiary protection refusal – informed he should address his query to IPAT – IPAT stated that they had no jurisdiction to hear such an appeal – Court refused application to amend the statement of grounds – he does not come within s. 70 of the 2015 Act or the 2013 regulations – whether he has the direct right under Dublin III to an appeal against the subsidiary protection decision – the take back request was made before the making of the Dublin III regulation - Dublin III simply does not apply - whether there is a right of appeal under the European Union (Dublin System) Regulations 2014 - IPAT cannot expand its own jurisdiction – Court would refuse relief on the basis of discretion based on his delay and conduct – no basis for a reference to the CJEU demonstrated – application for an injunction refused – judicial review refused.