Tenancies Tribunal did not show bias or depart from principles of natural or constitutional justice

Proceedings concern a trio of appeals brought pursuant to s.123 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2004, as amended, against a determination of a Tenancy Tribunal: (A) on 12th February, 2016 (which appears to be the determination order to which the notice of motion makes reference when it refers to a determination issued on 19th February, 2016) (‘Appeal A’); (B) on 22nd April, 2016 (which appears to be the determination order to which the notice of motion makes reference when it refers to a notice of motion communicated on 25th April, 2016) (‘Appeal B’); and (C) on 21st June, 2016 (‘Appeal C’) - appellants ought to have joined the landlords to the within appeals as the landlords interests are directly affected by same - appellants entered into tenancy agreement with the landlords in August 2009 - in September 2014 the appellants submitted an application for a dispute resolution contesting the validity of a rent increase - in appeal A, the respondent did not depart from any principle of natural or constitutional justice - in November 2015 the appellants submitted an application for dispute resolution services in the context of a rent arrears and over holding dispute - the appellants did not attend the adjudication held later that month - appeal B found to be unbiased - in February 2016 the appellants submitted a third application for dispute resolution and did not attend that hearing - Appeal C found to have failed.