Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal against the severity of a three-year sentence for money laundering, originally imposed by the Dublin Circuit Criminal Court. The appellant, a 61-year-old Lithuanian national residing in the UK, had pleaded guilty to laundering €56,350. The Court found no error in principle with the headline sentence of four and a half years, which was reduced to three years in consideration of mitigatory factors. The Court also upheld the decision not to suspend any part of the sentence, taking into account the appellant's early guilty plea, lack of previous convictions, and personal circumstances.
Court of Appeal, money laundering, Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Act 2010, sentence severity, appeal dismissal, headline sentence, mitigatory factors, suspended sentence, guilty plea, no previous convictions, criminal organisation, Sinnott case, intelligence-led operation, An Garda Síochána, surveillance, cash seizure.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.