Court of Appeal allows appeal of dismissal of claim for damages arising from an alleged assault which took place at a disco hosted by a rugby club and remits the matter to the High Court for a full rehearing, finding that there was no analysis or explanation by the trial judge as to how the assault did occur if it did not occur within the club premises in the manner claimed by the plaintiff, which amounted to an error in law.
Practice and procedure – appeal of dismissal of plaintiff’s claim for damages arising from alleged assault which took place at disco hosted by rugby club – whether incident occurred on the premises of the rugby club – whether the appellate court is bound by the trial judge’s finding of fact that the incident did not occur within the hall – whether there was credible evidence that the assault did not occur inside the club – Supreme Court’s decision in Doyle v. Banville – whether judge engaged with the evidence – no direct evidence of assault happening outside the club was surely a factor which had to be weighed in the balance if the judge was to engage properly with the evidence – there was no analysis or explanation as to how the assault did occur if it did not occur within the club premises in the manner claimed by the plaintiff – matter remitted to High Court for full rehearing – appeal allowed.