Tribunal considered all relevant material in refusing Ethiopian national refugee status

Judicial review – asylum and immigration – substantive decision - Ethiopian national challenging the decision of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal (now the International Protection Appeals Tribunal) refusing him refugee status – failed to take into account relevant information – role of the Court in judicial review - claim for refugee status - decision under challenge – granted leave on a single ground – letter – country of origin information - no suggestion in the IPAT decision that the tribunal chose to prefer the contents of a conflicting report over supportive reports – nothing in the IPAT decision that is directly inconsistent with the contents of the relevant extract from The Human Rights Watch report - tribunal considered all of the relevant material as part of its overall consideration of the credibility of the claim - attempt to pursue other grounds of challenge without leave - no jurisdiction to consider either of the grounds upon which the Ethiopian sought, but was not granted, leave to seek judicial review – judicial review refused.