Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses judicial review of the decision refusing a Bangladeshi national subsidiary protection on the grounds that the International Protection Appeals Tribunal decision: lawfully assessed his credibility, provided ample information to enable him to assess whether the decision was lawful and the decision on internal relocation was lawful in circumstances where there was an unequivocal finding that the claims were not credible
Judicial review – asylum and immigration – Bangladeshi national challenging the decision refusing him subsidiary protection – substantive decision – refused asylum - applied for subsidiary protection - extension of time - grounds of challenge - balance of probabilities standard of proof to establish past events - assessment of credibility - obligation to provide reasons - ample information to enable him to assess whether the decision was lawful - internal relocation – alleged conflict between those two decisions on the proper interpretation of Article 8 of the Qualification Directive - finding completely severable from the first, separate and free-standing one that there was no substantial basis to believe that the applicant would face a real risk of serious harm if returned to Bangladesh – judicial review refused.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only fast reporting service for all Irish judgments over the past ten years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now