Tribunal made unreasonable findings in refusing Nigerian national’s applications for international protection

Asylum and immigration – judicial review – Nigerian national challenging decision of the International Protection Appeals Tribunal refusing his application for international protection - says that his sexual orientation is heterosexual - claims that he was attacked at his apartment in Nigeria by a crowd of homophobes who believed him and (it seems) his housemates to be homosexuals – fled and came to Ireland – refused international protection - decision does not lack clarity – tribunal’s assessments were not vague – tribunal engaged in conjecture and/or speculation in the evaluation of his evidence -must be a logical nexus between findings of fact and the ensuing decision – inferences drawn from the evidence were unreasonable – whether the tribunal failed to have regard to the legal submissions – tribunal did not fully appreciate the case made – one’s case should be decided by reference to the facts that present – tribunal failed to take any or adequate regard of his explanations – tribunal took into account irrelevant considerations in its assessment of his credibility – tribunal made unreasonable findings – judicial review granted –