Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Tribunal’s findings in refusing a Ghanaian national international protection were not unreasonable
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses judicial review of the decision refusing a Ghanaian national international protection, on the grounds that: the findings of the International Protection Appeals Tribunal were, however unfavourable, not so unreasonable as not to be open for it to make; the tribunal considered all matters; and the reasons provided satisfied the requirements for reasons in the circumstances.
Asylum and immigration – judicial review – Ghanaian national challenging the decision of the International Protection Appeals Tribunal to refuse him international protection – refused international protection in the State - entered into a relationship with a Nigerian national and had a child – deportation order made against the mother - child has been given some form of permission to remain – mother and father remain without permission – applied for review of decision refusing leave to remain – application outstanding – adverse credibility findings – argued that the decision was unreasonable and irrational – findings open to the decision maker - tribunal’s findings, however unfavourable, were so unreasonable as not to be open to the decision make – alleged failure to take into account relevant factors - all matters submitted were considered – alleged lack of reasons – four reasons given - satisfied the requirements for reasons in the circumstances – judicial review refused –
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
