Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court rules that a mortgage that was not registered with the Companies Registration Office before a company went into liquidation was void as against a liquidator, and grants the liquidator injunctions restraining the defendant from taking steps to sell and/or dispose of the mortgaged property and from impeding the liquidator from gaining access to the mortgaged property.
Mortgage in respect of a loan advanced by the defendant to a Company in June 2018 prior to the Company going into liquidation - Mortgage was registered by the defendant with the Property Registration Authority but not with the CRO - priority which should be afforded to the defendant in respect of the Mortgage in circumstances where the Mortgage was not registered with the CRO - relevant legal provisions regarding registration of a charge created by a company - registration requirements are not discretionary in nature - charge however remains enforceable as against the company itself even if not registered - whether the security is enforceable against a liquidator, despite non-registration, where a default has occurred while the company is a going concern and enforcement steps are taken prior to the appointment of a liquidator - loan offer letter – mortgage - whether the defendant validly took possession of the Mortgaged Property - the unregistered Mortgage is now void as against the plaintiff liquidator – statute does not exempt charges/mortgages which are in the process of enforcement – injunction - courts will be slow to grant any relief that is likely to end matters before a plenary action – defendant is unable to continue to rely on the Mortgage as against the liquidator - defendant restrained from dealing with and/or disposing of the Mortgaged Property including taking steps to market or advertise the Mortgaged Property for sale and restrained from impeding the liquidator’s access to the property –
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.