Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal dismisses appeal against the severity of sentence of five years’ imprisonment imposed for a violent and unprovoked attack on the injured party in the smoking area of a bar, finding that the headline sentence of seven years identified by the trial judge was acceptable, and no error in principle had been identified.
Criminal law – sentencing – appeal against the severity of five years’ imprisonment imposed for assault causing serious harm – s.4 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, 1997 – whether the headline sentence of seven years identified by the trial judge was too high – violent and unprovoked attack on the injured party – no error in principle identified – appeal allowed.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.