Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court holds that will was invalid due to uncertainty of its provision, and because it was witnessed by proposed beneficiaries, and declares that purported testator died intestate.
Probate - interpretation of will - will prepared without legal advice - lack of revocation clause - whether previous will revoked by implication - intention of testator - ambiguities in will - use of term "family" - approach of court in construction of will - s 90, Succession Act 1965 - extrinsic evidence - whether insertion of clause appropriate to supply proper sense to will - will witnessed by named beneficiaries - s 82, 1965 Act - lack of specificity - unspecified "gifts of money" and "smaller gifts".
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.