Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court grants an application for a young adult with intellectual disability and ADHD to transition from a residential care placement to his mother's home, despite the expiration of funding for his current placement and opposition from the guardian ad litem, the court finding no concrete evidence that the move would be unsafe or constitute a breach of the individual's constitutional rights; and the decision was made in light of the individual's expressed wish to live with his mother and the availability of community services and professional support familiar with HSE's safeguarding policy. Additionally, the court declares the individual a ward of court, recognising his incapacity to manage his own affairs.
Intellectual disability - ADHD - wardship - voluntary care - capacity assessment - High Court - Child and Family Agency - Health Service Executive (HSE) - guardian ad litem - transition plan - risk assessment - safeguarding - community services - National Learning Network (NLN) - Youth Advocacy Project (YAP) - funding decisions - separation of powers - Article 40.3 of the Constitution - personal rights - protective duty - residential care - family home - statutory agencies - best interests - safety concerns.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.