Criteria not met for injunction removing or restraining liquidator

Liquidation – injunctions - petition to wind up company – liquidator owed €172,820.64 on foot of a High Court judgment – fraud alleged – injunction restraining the liquidator from progressing litigation for monies allegedly owed – restraining liquidator from acting – fraud, deception, deceit – set aside High Court judgments – application refused - has not made out or met the relevant criteria for the award of an interlocutory injunction - final orders which cannot be set aside by another judge in separate proceedings - application to set aside those judgments is one that should have been made on notice to the other parties having an interest in the application - substance of the allegation of fraud itself – principles governing the granting of injunctions – appealed to the Court of Appeal and then applied for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court - in order to ground an action to set aside a judgment, the plaintiff must allege fraud in the true sense, that is deliberate and purposeful dishonesty, knowing and intentional deceit of the court - the fraud alleged must be such as to affect the impugned decision in a fundamental way - particularity in pleading – allegations against judges – stamp duty was paid at the wrong level - applicant has repeatedly sought to go behind orders made by various judges of the High Court, in order to advance an argument that this court has no jurisdiction - cannot look behind two orders made by two different judges - rule in Henderson v. Henderson – application refused