Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Leave to appeal refused in planning proceedings where no questions of exceptional public importance arise
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses to grant leave to appeal in two sets of proceedings pursuant to planning legislation, and refuses to to certify any of the questions raised, on the grounds that: (1) none of the questions raise a question of law of exceptional public importance; (2) there was no material reason as to why it would be in the public interest to resolve the questions raised; and (3) the fact that an appellant does not agree with the conclusion of a judgment cannot be used to label the state of law as being "uncertain".
Judicial Review - planning and development - section 50 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 - leave to appeal - two judgments not formally linked - point of law of exceptional public importance - public interest - leave refused.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
