Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court: (a) refuses to make a winding up order in respect of a company found by an inspector to have engaged in a fraud on its investors, on the grounds that the company had no assets and no prospect of recovering any assets such that it would not be possible to remunerate a liquidator, and no person had been found who would be prepared to act in that capacity; and (b) adjourns the question of future directions, to include the issue of whether a web hosting service (Google) was bound by a court order to disclose the company's e-mails and other records.
Company law - appointment of inspector to enquire into affairs of company - finding by inspector that company intended to defraud investors - non-existent Christmas trees - whether to wind up company - failure of company and its officers to co-operate with inspector - no access to company records - investments of over €7 million - €1.2 million to shareholder and director of company - €1.5 million to associated companies - no assets in company - further directions.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.