Mandatory injunction - plaintiff claims that the defendants are acting unlawfully in using the information obtained from its website - injunction sought to require the defendants to prevent certain online travel agents from providing what the plaintiff describes as ‘false’ e-mail addresses for travellers on whose behalf they book flights with the plaintiff - plaintiff’s basic complaint is that when some of the OTAs book a flight with the plaintiff for a customer they do not give the plaintiff the e-mail or telephone number of that customer - instead, they provide an e-mail address or telephone number created or operated by the OTA itself - plaintiff claims that this causes confusion and difficulties for the customer and for the plaintiff - plaintiff seeks to oblige the defendants to require these OTAs to furnish the plaintiff with the personal email address or telephone number of the passenger on whose behalf they book flights with the plaintiff - application for mandatory relief - applicant can only succeed if it establishes that it has a strong and clear case that is likely to succeed at trial - defendants’ claim that the plaintiff abuses a dominant position on O&D route pairings by seeking to impose on users its website preclusions on the commercial exploitation of PFT information obtained therefrom – raises a serious issue such as to lower the plaintiff’s claim on foot of those TOU beneath the threshold required to obtain mandatory interlocutory relief.