Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court grants a divorce decree and ancillary reliefs following a lengthy legal process initiated in 2017. The court found that the primary responsibility for the delays rested with the appellant, who benefited from residing in the unencumbered family home while the respondent incurred rental costs. The original decision by the Circuit Family Court to grant the divorce and ancillary reliefs was upheld, with the court ordering the sale of the family home and an equal division of assets and savings, while addressing rental arrears and costs associated with the proceedings.
Divorce Decree, Ancillary Reliefs, Family Law (Divorce) Act 1996, Delay in Proceedings, Defence and Counterclaim, Affidavit of Means, Settlement Attempts, Case Progression, Marital Assets, Pension Entitlements, Property Sale, Rental Arrears, Ward of Court, Proper Provision, Equal Division of Assets, Costs Order, Stay on Orders, Liberty to Apply.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.