Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Multi-million euro stallion in ownership dispute to remain at defendants’ stud farm
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court has refused the plaintiffs' application for a mandatory injunction to move a valuable stallion to a third-party stud farm, amidst a heated ownership dispute. The plaintiffs claimed full ownership, while the defendants claimed a 50% interest. The court found that the plaintiffs did not establish a strong case likely to succeed at trial, and that damages were an adequate remedy for both parties. The court ordered that the stallion remain at the defendants' stud, with conditions for regular veterinary examinations and accounting for earnings and expenses until the trial.
mandatory injunction, ownership dispute, stallion, stud farm, financial irregularities, welfare concerns, conversion, detinue, damages, status quo, Partnership Act 1890, Mareva injunction, profit-sharing agreement, High Court, case management, veterinary examinations, accounting.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
