Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court has ordered the return of a child to Poland, finding that while allegations of grave risk were supported by evidence, the protective measures in Poland were deemed sufficient to mitigate such risks. The court also considered the child's objections to returning but questioned their independence, ultimately deciding in favour of return. The decision comes after a detailed examination of the child's circumstances and the effectiveness of legal protections available in Poland.
Child abduction, Hague Convention, wrongful removal, habitual residence, Poland, Ireland, grave risk, protective measures, parental custody rights, objections of the child, undertakings, psychological assessment, domestic violence, alcohol addiction, supervised access, delay in proceedings, return order, welfare of the child, European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), discretion of the court.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.