Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court has admitted a will to probate including a bequest of a dwelling house, despite numerous attempted obliterations. The court found that the obliterations did not constitute an act of "destruction" and therefore did not revoke the original bequest. The court also determined that the alterations were likely made after the will's execution and were not valid under section 86 of the Succession Act, 1965, as they were not executed in the manner required for the will. Consequently, the original bequest to the deceased's brother was valid, and an inserted bequest of IR£1 was excluded from the will as admitted to probate.
Succession Act, 1965 - Probate - Will Alteration - Obliteration - Partial Intestacy - Bequest - Legal Personal Representative - Execution of Will - Testamentary Intent - Section 86 (Succession Act, 1965) - Animus Revocandi (intention to revoke) - Homemade Will - Legal Advice on Wills
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.