The High Court has refused to grant summary judgment to the plaintiff, a loan management company, and sent the claim to plenary hearing. The plaintiff, claiming to be the ultimate successor to the original lender, sought repayment of a loan facility amounting to €660,409.77. The defendant challenged the plaintiff's standing, citing a lack of prima facie evidence to establish a valid chain of title from the original lender. Additionally, the defendant raised issues regarding the admissibility of a "Statement of Account" and questioned the plaintiff's authority to service the loan, given that the original proceedings were initiated by an entity not authorized as a credit servicing firm. The court found that the plaintiff had not provided sufficient evidence to prove it was the rightful owner of the loan and that the Statement of Account was compiled in the ordinary course of business. Consequently, the court determined that a full hearing was necessary to resolve these issues fairly and justly.
debt recovery, summary judgment, plenary hearing, loan ownership, chain of title, prima facie evidence, credit servicing firm, admissibility, Statement of Account, ordinary course of business, High Court, Civil Law and Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020, Supreme Court of Judicature (Ireland) Act 1877, Harrisrange principles, GDPR, Central Bank Act 1997, Pepper Finance Corporation, Ennis Property Finance DAC, Bank of Scotland plc (BoS), Bank of Scotland Ireland Ltd (BOSI), GDP Capital Real Estate Ltd (GDP), Fitzwilliam Loan Management Unlimited Company.