Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal dismisses an application by the Director of Public Prosecutions for a review of a sentence deemed unduly lenient, affirming the original decision of the sentencing judge. The respondent had received a three-year prison sentence, with the final 18 months suspended, for dangerous driving causing death while under the influence of alcohol. The Court of Appeal concluded that the sentence, including the suspension of part of the term and a driving disqualification, fell within the margin of appreciation afforded to the sentencing judge.
Court of Appeal, undue leniency, dangerous driving causing death, drunken driving, sentence review, Criminal Justice Act 1993, Road Traffic Act 1961, Road Traffic (No.2) Act 2011, Road Traffic Act 2010, suspended sentence, driving disqualification, early plea of guilty, mitigation, remorse, DPP v Flynn, DPP v Cambridge, DPP v Nestor, DPP v O’Dwyer, DPP v Welby, DPP v James Doyle, s.2 Criminal Justice Act 1993 review, margin of appreciation.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.