Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court grants application to extend a period of bankruptcy, arising from: (1) a failure to cooperate on several fronts with the official assignee in the realisation of the assets of the bankrupt's estate; (2) failing to disclose certain income or assets to the official assignee; and (3) failing to provide a statement of affairs in accordance with legislation.
Bankruptcy - application to extend period of bankruptcy - failure to cooperate with official assignee in realisation of assets - hiding from or failing to disclose income or assets to official assignee - consideration of period of possible extension - cross-examination official assignee - grounds advance to extend period of bankruptcy - movement of machinery from family farm - no evidence from bankrupt that machinery was not properly part of estate assets vested in official assignee - no explanation provided for cash sum found on bankrupt's premises - marvea injunctions applied for to prevent dissipation of certain monies from relevant bank accounts relating to bankrupt - absence of statement of affairs - difficulties encountered in administering estate of bankrupt - significant failure to cooperate - efficacy of bankruptcy process should be properly protected
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.