Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court dismissed the appeal of a coach operator challenging the refusal of a substantial VAT refund in relation to its operation of an interurban express bus route. The operator sought repayment of VAT paid on coaches under tax provisions intended to benefit businesses primarily engaged in the group transport of tourists. The court concluded that the operator was not eligible for the refund, as its business was not principally or exclusively the carriage of tourists under contracts for group transport, but rather the provision of a public transport service accessible to all members of the public. The court also found that the legislative provisions require multiple contracts for group transport focused on tourists, and that the vehicles in question were primarily used for general public transport, causing the claim to be disqualified. The decision reinforces the strict interpretation of tax exemptions and derogations, upholding the predominant purpose and contractual framework as decisive criteria.
VAT refund – touring coaches – public transport service – group transport contracts – tourists – burden of proof – strict interpretation – tax derogation – Value-Added Tax (Refund of Tax) (Touring Coaches) Order – Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 – Public Transport Regulation Act 2009 – Interpretation Act 2005 – qualifying person – disapplication clause – Revenue Commissioners – appeal dismissed
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.