European court asked to clarify whether time to appeal order removing children from State can be extended

Social services – child abduction – scope and operation of Council Regulation No. 2201/2013 – Brussels II bis Regulation – interim care orders which had been made in the United Kingdom prior to the arrival of the children in this State – whether to have the return order to Hampshire County Council recognised in Ireland by means of an application to the High Court – parents out of time by two days to lodge appeal in Irish Court – Article 33(5) of Brussels II bis Regulation – whether the High Court had jurisdiction to extend time for the purposes of appeal – reporting restrictions – s. 45(1) of the Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act 1961 – recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments pursuant to Chapter III of the Brussels II bis Regulation – whether the order of the English High Court comes within the scope of the Brussels II bis Regulation – whether the English High Court order so far as it concerned the return of the children via the Chapter III procedure amounts to a wrongful circumvention of Article 11 of the Regulation and, by extension, of the entire Hague system – whether the procedure adopted by Hampshire County Council had the effect of compromising the procedural rights of the parents – Order 42A of the Rules of the Superior Courts, as inserted by the Rules of the Superior Courts (Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments) 2016 (S.I. No. 9 of 2016) – delays on the part of the parents –whether there is a jurisdiction to extend purposes of Article 33(5) – questions referred to CJEU.