Litigant’s claim to be immune from court orders and summonses is an abuse of process

Practice and procedure – motion to dismiss for failing to disclose any cause of action – litigant in person claims to be protected from all court summonses and court orders by reference to provisions of the Constitution and of the Treaty of Europe – series of similar cases - unscrupulous people availing of the credulity of lay litigants and encouraging them to launch claims which, legally at least, make absolutely no sense - the claim – unfounded allegation of perjury - unfounded allegations he makes against a solicitor who is simply doing her job – application for an adjournment refused - piquancy in making this claim in proceedings in which (presumably) a court order is sought in circumstances where the foundation stone of the proceedings is that there is no such thing as a valid summons and no such thing as a valid court order – proceedings dismissed – abuse of process – fail to disclose any cause of action –