Long-term police suspension upheld as appeal dismissed pending clarification on decision-making analysis

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal in proceedings brought by a suspended member of the national police force who challenged the lawfulness of his continued suspension and the adequacy of reasons provided for that suspension, following a High Court decision that largely rejected his claims. The appellant argued that he had not been given sufficient reasons or documentation justifying his long-term suspension during extended investigations into alleged interference with penalty notices and receipt of a gift. The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's findings that the appellant was always aware of the general reasons for his suspension and had not specifically requested particulars or challenged the underlying basis in a timely manner. However, the Court determined that one outstanding issue concerning whether the decision-making process included sufficient analysis of relevant factors should be further addressed and listed this point for further directions. The appeal regarding unequal treatment with other officers and the challenge to the statutory powers for suspension were also rejected. The court retained the High Court's declaration that the appellant was entitled to sufficient information to understand the factors behind his suspension, noting this matter had relevance for ongoing and similar cases.