Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
 Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
 
			| or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments | 
The Court of Appeal overturned a conviction for manslaughter that had been imposed by the Circuit Criminal Court after a fatal fire in an apartment building. Although the accused was found guilty by a jury of causing the fire (arson) and burglary, the central issue on appeal concerned whether the chain of causation between the accused’s actions and the deceased’s death remained intact, given that the deceased had safely escaped the burning building before voluntarily re-entering it and succumbing to smoke inhalation. The Court held that, as the deceased acted independently after reaching safety and not as a direct or foreseeable consequence of the accused’s actions, the act of returning broke the chain of causation and the accused’s arson could not be considered a significant contributing factor to the death. The court concluded that the trial judge erred in allowing the manslaughter count to go to the jury, quashed the manslaughter conviction, and allowed the appeal.
manslaughter appeal – chain of causation – arson – burglary – novus actus interveniens (new intervening act) – voluntary and independent act – unlawful killing – Dublin Circuit Criminal Court – Court of Appeal – Criminal Damage Act 1991 – Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001 – significant contributing factor – R v Gallbraith – legal test for causation – jury direction – quashing of conviction
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
 Click here to request a subscription.